Anti-Spyphone vs iPhone Which is the winner of privacy?
It might be time to challenge the myth that the iPhone is safe.
Apple positions the iPhone as the safest smartphone by fully emphasizing privacy protection.
However, in reality, surveillance behind the scenes and backdoors permitted by the OS are gradually coming to light.
In this article, we will thoroughly compare AntiSpyPhone and the iPhone.
If this is true, you might feel that the iPhone could be a bit risky.
Privacy Feature Comparison Table
| Feature Items | iPhone (iOS) | AntiSpyPhone |
| Microphone control | Not possible (physically on even if restricted in settings) | ✅ Fully disable per profile and immediate control |
| DuressPass (forced unlock password) | ❌ None | ✅ Fake account display and automatic data deletion with specific password |
| Non-retention of call history | ❌ Call history is retained | ✅ Completely non-retentive (app selection + OS control) |
| Network access control | Restrictable on some apps | ✅ Complete blocking of Wi-Fi / mobile communication at OS level |
| Google / Apple tracking | ❌ Always linked to Apple ID | ✅ Fully independent and anonymous use without Google |
| Open source nature | ❌ Closed source, black box | ✅ 100% OSS, verifiable code |
Does the microphone "not turn off" even when turned off?
On the iPhone, even if you "intend to turn off" the microphone, you cannot completely prevent background access by apps or the OS.
Even Apple does not fully leave it up to the user; there are indications that exceptions exist for "emergencies" and "official apps."
On the other hand, AntiSpyPhone can disconnect the microphone itself at the system level. It can completely shut down the microphone, camera, and sensors per profile.
Minimizes the risk of voice eavesdropping.
DuressPass: "Fake Unlock" when threatened
If you are forcibly compelled to unlock your smartphone, will your data be protected?
The iPhone does not have features like fake home screens or dummy accounts.
When you enter the AntiSpyPhone's "Duress Pass" (forced unlock password), a fake clean account is displayed or specific data is automatically erased.
This feature is also attracting attention as a countermeasure against state-level interrogations.
The choice to "leave absolutely no call history or logs"
On the iPhone, call history is always recorded and included in backups (it is retained even if iCloud is turned off).
AntiSpyPhone uses call apps that leave no history (e.g., SimpleX or Session) and can be configured to leave no records even at the OS level.
It fundamentally eliminates any chance of "checking later."
Summary
Time to wake up from the safety myth
The iPhone may be sufficiently safe for general users.
However, in environments where true confidentiality is required, or for corporate insiders, journalists, activists, and the like, the iPhone has entered a realm it can no longer fully protect.
AntiSpyPhone is a smartphone for those who seriously want to protect themselves.
If you seek proven structural safety rather than a safety myth, the choice is clear.
